I am again calling on all Major Mainstream News/Media Organizations, Social Media Sites, Blogs, and any other information centers to explain the serious consequences of any nation Bombing Nuclear Facilities. One thing that all intelligent individuals and other individuals agree, there will be serious environmental consequences!

1. Air Contamination • If uranium hexafluoride gas is released (common in enrichment facilities), it can react with moisture in the air to form hydrofluoric acid, a highly toxic substance. • However, experts note that uranium isotopes used in enrichment are relatively low in radiological hazard. Most contamination would likely stay localized, especially if the facility is underground or shielded by rock. • In contrast, bombing a nuclear power plant or spent fuel pool could release Cesium-137, Iodine-131, and Polonium-210, which are far more dangerous and can travel long distances on wind currents.

2. Water Contamination • Radioactive materials can leach into groundwater or nearby rivers, especially if cooling systems or waste storage areas are damaged. • Uranium compounds and fission products can persist in water sources, posing long-term risks to both ecosystems and human health. • In some cases, hydrofluoric acid formed in the air can also dissolve into rainwater, leading to acid rain and further contamination.

3. Farmland and Soil • Fallout from radioactive particles can settle on crops and soil, contaminating food supplies and making farmland unusable for years or decades. • Cesium-137, in particular, binds to soil and is taken up by plants, entering the food chain. This was a major issue after Chernobyl and Fukushima. • Depending on the isotope and exposure level, the land may require decontamination or long-term exclusion zones.

Do you support bombing nuclear facilities, knowing that the results of the bombing will include: Widespread and long-term Air, Water, and Soil Contamination that will possibly sicken and kill millions? Speak Up!

At this point in the Israeli-Iran conflict, there has been limited media coverage on the environmental risks of the Israeli strike on Iran’s nuclear facilities. Some reports have confirmed internal nuclear contamination; however, Iranian authorities have stated that there has been no radiation leaked externally. For the safety of citizens in Iran and adjacent Middle Eastern countries, there is still a paramount need for broader environmental reporting regarding short-term and long-term nuclear contamination

Below are several factors that may contribute to the lack of accelerated and expanded media coverage:

• Official Statements: Iran’s Atomic Energy Organization maintains that containment protocols were successful, minimizing public risk.
• Geopolitical Focus: Most reports emphasize military and diplomatic consequences, rather than environmental fallout.
• Restricted Access: Iran has imposed internet restrictions, limiting independent assessments.

Potential regional environmental risks include the dispersal of nuclear material which could affect air, soil, and water sources, impacting agriculture and human health. Additionally, the release of hazardous chemicals that affect ecosystems and groundwater and the spread of nuclear materials to neighboring countries.

IAEA Director General Rafael Grossi has emphasized that nuclear facilities must never be attacked, warning that such actions could have grave consequences for people and the environment. The agency is prepared to deploy nuclear safety experts to assist Iran in assessing and mitigating risks

For the reasons mentioned above and others, members of the global community are calling for an immediate de-escalation of the conflict. I call on the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and all members of Social and Mainstream media sources to shine a bright light on the possible short-term and long-term environmental consequences of Israeli airstrikes on Iran which could negatively affect entire Middle Eastern countries.

IAEA Director General Rafael Grossi has emphasized that nuclear facilities must never be attacked, warning that such actions could have grave consequences for people and the environment. The agency is prepared to deploy nuclear safety experts to assist Iran in assessing and mitigating risks

There is a Global March to Gaza of pro-Palestinians. Members of this group include doctors, students, lawyers, and everyday people. The Global March to Gaza has drawn participation from over 50 countries and more than 400 organizations, all heading to the Egypt-Rafah crossing. Their goal is to pressure world leaders into taking action and allowing humanitarian aid into Gaza.

Let’s be clear, Pro-Palestinians are not the same as pro-Hamas. The Palestinians that are in Gaza are there because Gaza is part of their ancestral homeland. They are also there because of the “Circumstances of their Birth.”

There are “2,500 activists from over 50 countries marching to the Egypt to Rafah in Gaza. The activists consist of “doctors, students, lawyers, and everyday people.” FACT: “The Fourth Geneva Convention (Article 33) explicitly bans collective punishment, stating that no protected person may be punished for an offense they did not personally commit.”

Additionally, “Customary International Humanitarian Law (Rule 103) reinforces this prohibition, applying it to both international and non-international armed conflicts.” Violations of this principle can be considered war crimes under international legal frameworks.”

The humanitarian crisis of Palestinians in Gaza continues to worsen, with severe shortages of food, medical supplies, and minimal necessities. Reports state that the blockade has left nearly a third of essential supplies out of stock, and another third is expected to run out within two months.

Israeli military operations have resulted in tens of thousands of civilian casualties, widespread destruction of homes, hospitals, and infrastructure, and forced displacement. Reports indicate that over 120 Palestinians were killed in Israeli attacks across Gaza in just the past 24 hours, including many at aid centers. The ongoing blockade has restricted aid deliveries, leading to starvation and worsening health conditions.

Recent reports also indicate that dozens of Palestinians were killed near aid distribution centers in the past few days, as civilians attempted to access food and humanitarian assistance. The Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF), a controversial U.S.-backed organization, has been accused of weaponizing aid and operating under heavy military control, making it dangerous for civilians to receive assistance.

The United Nations has condemned Israeli efforts to dismantle the existing aid system, warning that the new distribution model forces Palestinian civilians into militarized zones to collect rations, further endangering lives. Palestinians are trapped in what can only be called “Hell On Earth.” The UN and humanitarian organizations continue to call for unimpeded access to aid and an immediate ceasefire to prevent further suffering.

In a media-charged world, It is impossible for members of the Global Citizenry to continue to witness the daily starvation and slaughter of innocent Palestinian men, women, and children and continue to Stand-By and do nothing. Silence is complicity. Where do you stand on this issue? The time for action is now and the “Global March to Gaza of pro-Palestinians” is on its way!

Breaking News: Commercial airlines flying over the United States are about to experience economic hardship due to the requirement for all domestic travelers to present a REAL ID.

For those unfamiliar with the REAL ID, here’s what you need to know: It is a federally compliant form of identification that meets enhanced security standards set by the REAL ID Act of 2005. This initiative was introduced to improve the reliability of state-issued IDs following recommendations from the 9/11 Commission.

Beginning May 7, 2025, a REAL ID-compliant driver’s license or identification card will be required to:

• Board domestic flights within the U.S.
• Enter federal buildings and military bases.

A REAL ID is marked with a gold star in the upper corner of the card. Some states use different symbols—for example, California places the star inside a bear outline.

If you do not have a REAL ID, you can still use a passport, military ID, or other TSA-approved identification for travel and federal access.

As of 2025, nearly 30% of Americans still do not have a REAL ID. The percentage varies by state, with some states having a significantly higher number of residents without one. Here are the five least prepared states:

• New Jersey – 61.2% without a REAL ID
• Pennsylvania – 60.4%
• Montana – 57.8%
• Illinois – 52.9%
• Tennessee – 51.0%

Conversely, the most prepared states include:

• Delaware – 88.6% of residents have a REAL ID
• New Mexico – 87.8%
• Maryland – 86.3%
• Vermont – 84.4%
• Indiana – 84.0%

Additionally, some states have a high percentage of residents uncertain whether they have a REAL ID, with Nebraska (20.4%) and Colorado (17.3%) leading in uncertainty.

The deadline for REAL ID enforcement is May 7, 2025, meaning travelers will need a REAL ID-compliant driver’s license or another accepted form of identification to fly domestically.

If you are married and have changed your last name after taking your spouse’s surname, you must provide legal documentation when applying for a REAL ID. This is because the name on your identification must match your official records. If your name has changed multiple times (e.g., due to marriage and divorce), you may need to provide a paper trail of all name changes.

To obtain a REAL ID, applicants must provide:

• Proof of identity (e.g., birth certificate, valid passport)
• Proof of Social Security number (e.g., Social Security card, W-2 form)
• Two proofs of residency (e.g., utility bill, rental agreement)
• Documentation of any name changes, such as a marriage certificate or court order.

Airlines in the U.S. are likely to face significant challenges due to this mandate. With fewer passengers able to meet REAL ID requirements, airlines may find themselves with an abundance of empty seats—potentially leading to layoffs among airline workers.

If Elon Musk, the wealthiest person in the world, can threaten to support primary challengers against Republican lawmakers who oppose President Trump’s policies, why can’t American voters leverage their collective vote against Republican lawmakers who fail to uphold the rule of law? They can—and they should. Voters must hold Republican lawmakers accountable by voting them out of office if they fail to defend the American justice system. The power of the American people’s vote is far greater than Elon Musk’s billions.

Musk has been vocal about his political stance, even compiling a so-called “naughty list” of lawmakers who didn’t align with Trump’s agenda. Several Republican senators have expressed concern about facing Musk-funded challengers. Republican lawmakers must decide whether to become Elon Musk’s puppets or to support the wishes of the thousands of voters who have taken to the streets in cities, towns, and hamlets across the nation.

America’s voters, who are already making their voices heard through protests, should also send letters to elected officials, demanding an end to the perversion of our constitutional democracy. It’s not too late for a course correction. However, the dismantling of federal institutions, the brain drain from the federal workforce, and misguided attacks on U.S. colleges and universities could set the nation back for generations.

Regardless of opinions about former President Biden, he left President Trump with a thriving economy that was the envy of the world, a low unemployment rate, and a booming stock market. All Trump had to do was plug minor holes in the system. Protesters shouldn’t just take to the streets—they should contact their legislators through phone calls, emails, letters, social media, town hall meetings, office visits, and advocacy groups. Doing nothing is not a strategy.

Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) policies are designed to promote fair treatment and equal opportunities for individuals from diverse backgrounds. These initiatives aim to create environments where all individuals have access to the same opportunities and are evaluated based on their abilities and contributions, without discrimination. Based on this definition, all Americans should agree to the principles listed under DEI.

The Trump administration forced government agencies to replace anything related to DEI with the so-called MEI framework (Merit, Excellence, and Intelligence). Trump’s merit-based system is a method of evaluating and selecting individuals—typically for jobs, promotions, or educational opportunities—based on their skills, qualifications, experience, performance, and achievements. Again, based on this definition of MEI, all Americans should agree to the principles listed under MEI.

Please, take a close look at both the definitions of DEI and MEI and tell me if you see any discernable differences in their definitions. I am an African-descended American and the only thing my people have ever demanded from our country is Affirmative Access and Equal Opportunities.

Both DEI and MEI call for hiring individuals based on their qualifications and abilities void of discrimination or legacy hiring. Point of Fact: African Americans occupy only 4% of so-called DEI positions in the American workplace. Do your research! Please Share and Comment…

Breaking News, when President Biden left office, the U.S. economy had both strengths and challenges. On the positive side, the economy had grown steadily during his term, with GDP expanding at an above-average rate, including a 3% growth in President Biden’s final year. Unemployment rates were low, and job creation was robust, with over 15 million jobs added during his presidency. Consumer spending and incomes were robust, contributing to economic growth.

However, there were notable challenges. Inflation surged to its highest level in over 40 years during his term, peaking at 9.1% in 2022 before moderating to under 3% by the end of his presidency. While inflation eased, the cost of essential items like food and housing remained significantly higher than pre-pandemic levels. Additionally, some sectors, like manufacturing, faced ongoing struggles.

So, while former President Biden left behind a growing economy with low unemployment, the lingering effects of inflation and sector-specific weaknesses painted a mixed picture. America had an opportunity to further expand the U.S. economy under President Kamala Harris. America, you missed the opportunity to continue moving the Biden economy forward, however, America is paying for choosing the wrong candidate in the 2024 presidential race. Many voters laugh at the concept of “Bidenomics”; however, they are crying under the so-called President Trump economy.

As we all remember, “Bidenomics” refers to the economic policies and vision of President Joe Biden during his administration. It focused on public investment, empowering middle-class workers, and promoting business competition, contrasting with trickle-down economics. Key legislation included the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021, the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022, and the CHIPS and Science Act of 2022. These policies aimed to boost green energy, domestic manufacturing, and union participation while increasing taxes on wealthy individuals and corporations.

I want to remind Americans that the Trump administration has made significant changes to various departments, including firing experts across fields like science, legal, economic, foreign policy, and environmental sectors and most recently, staff from the National Security Council.
Additionally, there have been mass layoffs at the Department of Health and Human Services, which raised concerns about the future of medical research. The administration also terminated the staff of a program that helps low-income households pay for heating. These decisions were part of broader restructuring efforts, often sparking debates about their impact on public services and governance.

My question to the American voters is, where do we go from here? Now, I know why so many Americans push against so-called wokeness. They wanted American voters to vote with their eyes closed. Let’s be clear, the REAL definition of “Wokeness” is a heightened awareness of social, political, and economic issues. Additionally, the term “woke” meant being alert. If Americans were “Woke” during the 2024 election, we would have a President Harris and a growing economy and would not have a dismantled federal workforce that has made America weak!

Americans still have time to save America’s democracy by (1) Protecting voting rights: Ensuring that every eligible citizen can vote without barriers is fundamental. This includes opposing voter suppression and advocating for fair election practices., (2) Strengthening institutions: Supporting independent judiciary systems, free press, and checks and balances helps safeguard democratic norms. (3) Increase Civic engagement: Staying informed, participating in local and national elections, and holding leaders accountable are crucial. and (4) Building trust: Encouraging dialogue across political divides and addressing misinformation can help rebuild trust in democratic processes.

This article is written in Honor and Gratitude to Brother Julius Malema of South Africa and Brother Ibrahim Traor’e of Burkina Faso. Let me begin:

South Africa’ ‘s Failure number ONE was the new democratic constitution that came out of the South Africa Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC) negotiations. It was the worst possible outcome for South Africa’s Aboriginal people. The TRC was supposedly the beginning of prosperity for the South African Aboriginal people. However, after the end of the brutal, legalized racial segregation called apartheid, the TRC did not deliver.

The South Africa Apartheid system of institutionalized racial segregation and discrimination in South Africa, technically lasted 46 years; however, if you consider the period of Anglo Zulu War it was actually 115 years. Evening considering this fact, the TRC didn’t call for the redistribution of wealth, nor did it provide for reparations of any kind for the South African Aboriginal people. Land and resources stolen from South Africa’s Aboriginal people will remain stolen until returned! White Africana farmers still control an estimated 73% of commercial farmland today.

The Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC) had three committees: the Human Rights Violations Committee, the Reparation and Rehabilitation Committee, and the Amnesty Committee. What kind of revolution leaves the wealth, natural resources, and quality land mainly in the hands of their former oppressors? South Africa’s Truth and Reconciliation Commission supported a pattern that provided corporate ownership concentration among a small number of private Caucasian firms. Hence, high levels of economic and social inequality continue to persist. I am certain that South Africia’s new leader, Brother Julius Malema and others, will address that problem soon.

A statement by South African Anglican Archbishop Desmond Tutu described living under apartheid this way: “Your dignity is not just rubbed in the dust. It is trodden underfoot and spat on. Our people are being killed as if they were but flies. Is that nothing to you who pass by?”
Fact: every South African Aboriginal should have been declared a victim/survivor by the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC) period.

The TRC presented a partial truth and failed to hold members of the brutal Caucasian minority Apartheid South African regime accountable for enforcing a system of violence, intimidation, humiliation, and death against the South African Aboriginals. There is no question about who the victim/survivors were and who the perpetrators are. Are we asking the South African Aboriginals to forgive and forget what happened to them?

“Twenty-one thousand people came forward, women and men, old and young, and told South Africa’s Truth and Reconciliation Commission about nearly 38,000 gross violations of human rights. Millions of victims remain un-named. Ninety percent of those who came forward were South African Aboriginals.” Again, when will the Caucasian minority Apartheid South African regime be held accountable to Aboriginal victim/survivors and their families?

The African National Congress (ANC)has been in political Power for 31 years. Under ANC rule, Caucasians continued to reap the rewards of their previous privilege under the new economic system. However, the ANC still draws compelling criticism for unrelenting poverty, inequality, viciousness, health crises, and depravity.

Facilities and educational systems for South African Aboriginals remain profoundly unequal. Again, when will transitional justice be realized, such as financial reparations, land and resources redistribution, and prosecutions of the perpetrators? When will South African Aboriginals victimized by the South Africa Apartheid regime and Caucasian citizens be made whole? I say, the time is now!

During the South African Apartheid occupation, total segregation and racial separation were not the main problems. The real issue for South African Aboriginals was that the minority whites had (have) complete control of the wealth-building apparatuses throughout the nation. They also possessed a destabilizing and disproportionate share of resources, including access to the best living areas, the best and most well-equipped schools, and the best and highest-paying jobs.

Even after the end of South Africa’s Apartheid system, the economic wealth-building systems in South Africa remain primarily in the hands of the South African Apartheid National Party and other Caucasian people. It is a fact that the ANC inherited a profoundly corrupt and inefficient state. However, a new generation of South African Aboriginals is actively questioning how adequately the legacies of apartheid have been dealt with when reforms of the economy, the judiciary, and the education system remain generally unchanged.

The question of accountability remains for members of the former brutal Caucasian minority South African Apartheid regime and its’ Caucasian citizens guilty of gross human rights violations during more than 115 years of inconceivable brutality and unimaginable trauma!
A large percentage of the South African Aboriginal population seems to be fighting for crumbs. During the civil rights movement of the 1960s, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. realized that you must have economic Power alongside political Power. If you don’t have economic Power, you can’t access exercise economic freedom.

South Africa Needs An “Economic Revolution”
I congratulate South Africa for taking a firm stand to save the lives of innocent citizens in Gaza; however, I think it’s time for South Africa to revisit the actions and results of the “Truth and Reconciliation Commission” and demand greater equity for South Africa’s Aboriginal People. South Africa needs an “Economic Revolution”. South Africa must nationalize its “Natural Resources” to ensure that ALL South Africans benefit from the natural resources given to them by the “The Most High”!

South African leaders are morally obligated to pay PREPARATIONS to South Africa’s Aboriginal People and redistribute the country’s WEALTH and Land so that all South Africans’ standard of living and quality of life is significantly enhanced. South African leaders must also demand “Fair Market Value” for their Natural Resources when dealing with (The World Bank & Internation Monetary Fund) and other foreign entities. South Africa’s “First-Rate Legal Team,” which fought the ICJ case, can also fight for “Fair Market Value” for its mineral wealth and provide prosperity, stability, equality, and equity for its Aboriginal people.

In the immediate future, South Africa must provide the South Africa’s Aboriginal People a Universal Basic Income (UBI).” It could provide a livable amount of money “on a need basic,” paid regularly to each citizen 18 and over. This pay level will be high enough to ensure a material existence and full participation in society. As we all know by now, the wealthiest man in the world came through the South Africa Apartheid system. He grew up as a privileged white boy with all the advantages that goes with it.

If you know anything about African history, you know that every African nation are rich in natural resources; however, African nations remain “POOR BY DESIGN”. Every African country must re-evaluate its relationship with the Industrial World. The exploitation of African nations’ Natural resources must come to an end NOW. Old contracts related to natural resources must be re-negotiated and brought up to 21st-century fair market values.

South Africa can start its new paradigm shift with the members of BRICS, namely Brazil, Russia, India, and China. It would be beneficial if WE contact One of South Africa’s favorite Sons, Mr. Trevor Noah, to do a documentary to inform the South African people and the world about the utter failure of the “Truth and Reconciliation Commission”.

We, members of Global African descendants’ communities are here for you. We are ready to Re-Seed and provide our skill sets when and where you need us. Please comment and share your thoughts about the content of this issue.

The Palestinians in Gaza, what a resilient group of people. Innocent men, women, and children are being starved and bombed at the same time. Who will cry, have mercy and compassion for their lives, their suffering? As the days turn into night, we sit, eat, and drink in the comfort of our favorite restaurants and bars, other members of our human families are living in what one can only call a Hell on Earth.

In total comfort. members of the world community witnessed, on media of their choice, the abomination/deaths of small children and babies that are gone too soon. As we move forward, how will we explain, to our children, this wicked level of man inhumanity to man?

Now, I want to discuss “Collective Punishment.” It is a deeply controversial topic that t involves penalizing a group of people for the actions of one or a few individuals within that group. Members of the world community argue that it is inherently inhumane and violates principles of justice and fairness, punishing innocent individuals who had no power over, nor involvement in the wrongdoing. International law, including the Geneva Conventions, prohibits collective punishment in times of conflict/war, recognizing its potential for abuse and harm.

I hope that ALL of the Israeli captives come home to their loved ones very soon. They don’t deserve the extreme trauma, pain, and misery that they have and are enduring. The stupidity, misguided, and deadly actions of Hamas cannot be forgiven. At the same time, the level of collective punishment against the Palestinian people cannot be acceptable by any moralistic being. May the Most High protect them also as they struggle to live to see another day! It’s past time that we join hands and demand Global PEACE!

I read that the DOGE group, which stands for the Department of Government Efficiency, is reportedly led by Elon Musk, and was involved in the recent incidents at the U.S. Institute of Peace and the U.S. African Development Foundation.

It is my understanding that members of the DOGE have not been publicly identified. The DOGE group has sparked significant controversy, as DOGE staff entered these organizations’ buildings despite protests about the two entities having independent status.

We are talking about the United States of America; therefore, don’t Americans have a right to know who these people are and what authority they are operating under? We know that Elon Musk is of South African origin. Are members of the DOGE also of South African origin? More importantly, are they American citizens? What’s going on here? Your comments are welcome…